Oh, yeah.. we can all agree to disagree on the subject. But the facts remain the facts and they are undisputed.
But when people have a go at whalers in one topic, with harsh words and unsubstantiated claims based on silly propaganda, in an attacking manner... And then want to straighten out someone else who does the same very thing, only from the other side...
Then it's called 'hypocricy' and that's just not gonna fly here if I have any say in the matter. If they see fit to hand it out, they also have to be prepared to take some in. That's all I wanted to make clear. And it's always the ones that shout the loudest, that actually know the least about the actual facts, actual statistics, actual laws and actual events. They take a biassed TV show as factual documentary. And that's not decent research.
You just can't go and verbally attack whalers in one topic with all sorts of claims that are mostly based upon propaganda and not facts, and then get high and mighty when the anti-whalers get attacked in return (with more factual backing actually).
That's my take on it. We've already had too many heated fanboy discussions here, and usaully it's not based on anything concrete, only fingerpointing and mudslinging..
And it reflects badly upon the forum, Vstep, AND the environmental organisations themselves aswell.
Regards,
Fred