Topic: Record Breakers (Read 24669 times)

Wave Music · « **Reply #25 on:** November 30, 2009, 00:01:20 »

Quote from: Daniel Cho on November 29, 2009, 23:56:52

I dont think that chart is right because even the Titanic is bigger than the Empire state building and the chart says Knock nevis is just as tall as Empire state.

Go check Titanic's length & come back here!

firestar12 · « **Reply #26 on:** November 30, 2009, 00:55:30 »

Quote from: matt5674 on November 27, 2009, 21:27:51

World's Largest Crude Carrier Jahre Viking. She is the record breaker of largest ship before Oasis of the Seas came. Jahre Viking was said to be scrapped by the shipbreakers sometime from now. Ship Sim would keep her memory alive if she is scrapped, like Ship Sim kept Titanic alive when she sank. So my suggestions for SS08:
VLCC Jahre Viking (Knock Nevis)
MV Oasis of the Seas
RMS Queen Mary 2
RMS Queen Elizabeth 2
MS Queen Elizabeth 3
and finally, Titanic's Hospitalic sister, HMHS Britannic.
Pictres in order:

QE3's twin Queen Victoria

Britannic is shrouded by Titanic's fame but is not forgotten.

Jahre Viking wasn't scrapped, Matt.

Capt. Matt · « **Reply #27 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:24:04 »

How big was titanic?

I forget

MMMMMM · « **Reply #28 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:31:39 »

882 1/2 i think

Capt. Matt · « **Reply #29 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:40:20 »

no there was a 7 somewhere that much I do remember

firestar12 · « **Reply #30 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:41:19 »

882' 9".

Capt. Matt · « **Reply #31 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:44:20 »

sure?

firestar12 · « **Reply #32 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:48:25 »

You're really going to ask an avid member of the TRMA if he's sure?

RMS Canada · « **Reply #33 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:48:58 »

Quote from: Daniel Cho on November 29, 2009, 23:56:52

I dont think that chart is right because even the Titanic is bigger than the Empire state building and the chart says Knock nevis is just as tall as Empire state.

The CN Tower is missing from that chart.

MMMMMM · « **Reply #34 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:50:58 »

Ok yes Shanes right, its 882ft. 9inch.

Its weird my book said 882 1/2 Ft

Capt. Matt · « **Reply #35 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:55:15 »

mine said 1/2 too :/

firestar12 · « **Reply #36 on:** November 30, 2009, 01:56:51 »

Because people aren't careful during research, that's one of the most common mistakes people make.

MMMMMM · « **Reply #37 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:10:24 »

My book is 882 1/2 Questions and answers about the titanic

Daniel Cho · « **Reply #38 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:04:13 »

Quote from: Wave Music on November 30, 2009, 00:01:20

Go check Titanic's length & come back here!

oops sorry

but i read a book that says it is bigger than the empire states $:-\$

MMMMMM · « **Reply #39 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:10:20 »

Are you sure it wasnt the Chrystler Building? Thats what mine says!

Daniel Cho · « **Reply #40 on:** November 30, 2009, 04:59:52 »

Quote from: MMMMMM on November 30, 2009, 03:10:20

Are you sure it wasnt the Chrystler Building? Thats what mine says!

even if it was the Chrystler Building, Titanic is still smaller by 12 meters and about 50 meters including Antenna/Spire
and the building did not even exist back at the titanic`s time line

Nathan|C · « **Reply #41 on:** November 30, 2009, 18:24:11 »

This isn't a Titanic topic guys, and I dont even think she was a record breaker

Ozy783 · « **Reply #42 on:** November 30, 2009, 19:38:37 »

Quote from: Nathan|C on November 30, 2009, 18:24:11

This isn't a Titanic topic guys, and I dont even think she was a record breaker

it was the First EPIC SHIP FAIL...

*no disrespect intended*

Kevinmcg_ships · « **Reply #43 on:** November 30, 2009, 19:53:32 »

I had a PowerPoint presentation in work last week, something to do with pep management talk or whatever they were trying to tell us (I was not paying attention) there was a line which said:

"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic."

What kind of idiot picked that up and used it in our PowerPoint presentation? Obviously someone was trying to be clever and impress the boss!

Wave Music · « **Reply #44 on:** November 30, 2009, 19:58:26 »

Quote from: Kevinmcg_ships on November 30, 2009, 19:53:32

"Remember, amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic."

That should be other way round!

Kevinmcg_ships · « **Reply #45 on:** November 30, 2009, 20:02:51 »

Quote from: Wave Music on November 30, 2009, 19:58:26

That should be other way round!

lol, I wanted to make a point of Titanic sinking on her maiden voyage, so how can that be professional, but decided not to speak up in case I got into trouble!

Wave Music · « **Reply #46 on:** November 30, 2009, 20:20:52 »

Quote from: Wave Music on November 29, 2009, 16:13:39

On that 1st image after the Emma Maersk the 3rd ship should be the TI class tankers (LOA = 380 meters)

http://www.aukevisser.nl/supertankers/id127.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI_class_supertankers

Found a model of a TI class tanker on Turbosquid. Looks nicely detailed.

http://www.turbosquid.com/FullPreview/Index.cfm/ID/462503

Ozy783 · « **Reply #47 on:** November 30, 2009, 20:25:47 »

Anyone gunna spend $150 for the whole community?

EDIT:
Just found this! http://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/lwo-lng-carrier-tanker--/412464
I thought it said ADF

Captain Cadet · « **Reply #48 on:** December 01, 2009, 20:25:13 »

Quote from: Ozy783 on November 30, 2009, 20:25:47

Anyone gunna spend $150 for the whole community?

EDIT:
Just found this! http://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/lwo-lng-carrier-tanker--/412464
I thought it said ADF

I don't think nobody will spend $150 (coed somebody turn that into pound) for us $:-\$

The Ferry Man · « **Reply #49 on:** December 01, 2009, 21:45:32 »

Quote from: Captain Cadet on December 01, 2009, 20:25:13

I don't think nobody will spend $150 (coed somebody turn that into pound) for us $:-\$

~Â£75

Author Topic: Record Breakers (Read 24669 times)

firestar12

firestar12

firestar12

firestar12

Nathan|C