Topic: naming ships (Read 3266 times)

djdave972 · « **on:** July 16, 2008, 19:35:29 »

hi all

is there a way to renaming ships to what you like ?

is there a small tanker ship coming out soon ?

djdave972

mvsmith · « **Reply #1 on:** July 16, 2008, 19:49:34 »

1. Only by re-skinning
2. Iâ€™ve seen no plans for a small tanker, although one is needed.

pauljanaway1 · « **Reply #2 on:** July 16, 2008, 20:40:02 »

i have nver heard of a small tanker ship being planed or talked about

Captain Best · « **Reply #3 on:** July 16, 2008, 20:42:06 »

Quote from: pauljanaway1 on July 16, 2008, 20:40:02

i have nver heard of a small tanker ship being planed or talked about

either do i. but always hope for it

More Ship. Then Better. But Same do i. Never Heard about it

pauljanaway1 · « **Reply #4 on:** July 16, 2008, 20:54:00 »

yes any new ships would be nice

Capt. Le Velle · « **Reply #5 on:** July 19, 2008, 03:09:31 »

i havent heard anybody talking about a small tanker

JHB · « **Reply #6 on:** July 19, 2008, 08:01:36 »

No..here we sail VLCCs

"small tanker"....hah!

Captain Best · « **Reply #7 on:** July 19, 2008, 12:04:40 »

Quote from: JHB on July 19, 2008, 08:01:36

No..here we sail VLCCs

"small tanker"....hah!

HAHAHA Jan.

We can have a tanker with size with Powerboat

Capt. Le Velle · « **Reply #8 on:** July 20, 2008, 05:54:38 »

if we get a tanker the size of a powerboat i want it to have jet engines

djdave972 · « **Reply #9 on:** July 23, 2008, 11:25:59 »

hi all
is there to re-skinning the ships then somehow ?

djdave972

NathanC · « **Reply #10 on:** July 23, 2008, 16:02:00 »

I would like to see a small tanker like this:

(http://imageshack.us)

About re-skinning, you can't do that, but it is a possible option in the future.

The Captain · « **Reply #11 on:** July 23, 2008, 17:51:53 »

Quote from: NathanC on July 23, 2008, 16:02:00

I would like to see a small tanker like this:

(http://imageshack.us)

About re-skinning, you can't do that, but it is a possible option in the future.

Now that is a ship that I would be more than happy to operate

!

NathanC · « **Reply #12 on:** July 23, 2008, 19:02:52 »

Me too, it was docked in Hull as we were leaving - can anyone tell me why the bow is high up like that?

The Captain · « **Reply #13 on:** July 23, 2008, 19:13:43 »

Well

:
1- it is in low water.
2-it's supposed to be like that
3- since all the oil has been taken out, the ship is more boyant so it rises up.

Those are all the things I can think of.

NathanC · « **Reply #14 on:** July 23, 2008, 19:15:25 »

Quote from: The Captain on July 23, 2008, 19:13:43

2-it's supposed to be like that

Well that helps....thanks

The Captain · « **Reply #15 on:** July 23, 2008, 19:18:22 »

Really? Or are you just kidding

.

topguncap · « **Reply #16 on:** July 26, 2008, 13:25:01 »

more cargo ships should be introduced

jemagnussen · « **Reply #17 on:** July 26, 2008, 17:48:46 »

Quote from: NathanC on July 23, 2008, 19:02:52

Me too, it was docked in Hull as we were leaving - can anyone tell me why the bow is high up like that?

Hi Nathan,

Believe the tanker is "Light" (directly translated from Danish...

) meaning it's unloaded, and reason the whole vessel (particular the stern) is not lifted to same level is becourse they have ballasted it with water to keep the rudder and propeller in water to maintain steering and thrust. Not that I'm a expert, but that is what we do on our little hopper dredger...

)

"MS Magnus"

Capt. Le Velle · « **Reply #18 on:** July 30, 2008, 22:36:48 »

Quote from: NathanC on July 23, 2008, 19:02:52

Me too, it was docked in Hull as we were leaving - can anyone tell me why the bow is high up like that?

what The Captain is right but the correct word for it is unladen

NathanC · « **Reply #19 on:** July 31, 2008, 07:31:57 »

Thanks MS Magnus, that explains it

Author Topic: naming ships (Read 3266 times)

mvsmith

NathanC

NathanC

NathanC

NathanC