Having only heard about those flicks, I wondered how a ship that size could be in water shallow enough to support a tsunami at a destructive height.
You, Sir, make a good point.
As for seeing it on RADAR, again the water would have to be shoaling.
At sea, a tsunami one meter high would be a monster.
In the film it's a wall of water 90ft high, which would show up, surely? If it was close enough to the epicentre of a seaquake, then could it not form a water wall that high. I know what you're saying about the surface disruption decreasing with the depth of water.
I still think we need to call it an appaling film and leave it at that.
Don't forget Lucky Larry!
Which one was he? Was he the one who wanted to drown himself and then changed his mind when the sea tried to do it for him?