Topic: Rate that Ugly Ship! (Read 424297 times)

krytsch · « **Reply #875 on:** January 20, 2011, 20:08:55 »

I don't think so - I've read somewhere(I don't remember where) that it's been wrecked. But to be honest I'm not sure.
But surely it' a very strange vessel ... even former GDR navy members don't know much about it.

"Reede-Minenabwehr Boot" does not mean spy ship. And how do you want to spy anything with this inconspicuous vessel? Do you think they hoped, that nobody would see it?

But what I wanted to say is that we've seen the Norwegian Epic, the A-Yacht and this one before. It is annoying and boring to search the now 36 pages before posting, so this will of course happen again.

larsdehaan · « **Reply #876 on:** January 20, 2011, 21:14:40 »

what the.... calm down dont make such a hassle about it.... you are p*****g me off

krytsch · « **Reply #877 on:** January 21, 2011, 16:51:46 »

Quote from: larsdehaan on January 20, 2011, 21:14:40

what the.... calm down dont make such a hassle about it.... you are p*****g me off

What's the matter, little boy - why don't you go to your mother and cry there?

alex 3d · « **Reply #878 on:** January 21, 2011, 18:56:35 »

krytsch · « **Reply #879 on:** January 21, 2011, 19:27:59 »

Quote from: larsdehaan on January 21, 2011, 18:45:47

my mother is dead an 45 years old you little.....

I little what?

I'm sorry that your mother died that young - and I really mean it - but it is no excuse for your rude behaviour.

freeciv · « **Reply #880 on:** January 21, 2011, 20:44:28 »

Quote from: alex 3d on January 21, 2011, 18:56:35

(image removed because it could be!)

Thats a semi submersible lift ship. But it does look funny

larsdehaan · « **Reply #881 on:** January 22, 2011, 09:39:23 »

Quote from: krytsch on January 21, 2011, 19:27:59

I little what?

I'm sorry that your mother died that young - and I really mean it - but it is no excuse for your rude behaviour.

this is going offtopic but my rude behavior?

krytsch · « **Reply #882 on:** January 22, 2011, 12:55:49 »

Quote from: larsdehaan on January 20, 2011, 21:14:40

what the.... calm down dont make such a hassle about it.... you are p*****g me off

Quote from: larsdehaan on January 22, 2011, 09:39:23

this is going offtopic but my rude behavior?

... well spotted!

So let's stop this now.

freeciv · « **Reply #883 on:** January 23, 2011, 00:37:23 »

Quote from: larsdehaan on January 22, 2011, 09:39:23

this is going offtopic ...

Yes

Quote from: krytsch on January 22, 2011, 12:55:49

So let's stop this now.

Agreed
Please stay on topic and stop arguing. (If you wish to continue arguing PM each other!)
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Look at this ship!

6/10

barrown1990 · « **Reply #884 on:** January 23, 2011, 00:47:15 »

Quote from: RMSGreatBritain on December 22, 2008, 19:34:50

This is an entirely opinion based topic. If you do not think something is ugly, Post something uglier please. Like this, Disney Wonder:

i have sailed ships that are alot worse than "Disney Wonder" on ship sim 2008

chris938 · « **Reply #885 on:** January 23, 2011, 13:00:53 »

this one looks weird... a kinda spin off of the 19th century battleship

VirtualSkipper · « **Reply #886 on:** January 23, 2011, 13:53:40 »

Quote from: chris938 on January 23, 2011, 13:00:53

this one looks weird... a kinda spin off of the 19th century battleship

LOL, I gotta admit, that is original

oceandream · « **Reply #887 on:** January 23, 2011, 15:17:10 »

The ugliest i have ever seen

oceandream · « **Reply #888 on:** January 23, 2011, 15:19:08 »

another one

VirtualSkipper · « **Reply #889 on:** January 23, 2011, 15:51:09 »

That ship, ironicly, capsized

RYAN123 · « **Reply #890 on:** January 24, 2011, 08:15:01 »

Quote from: freeciv on January 23, 2011, 00:37:23

Yes
Agreed
Please stay on topic and stop arguing. (If you wish to continue arguing PM each other!)
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Look at this ship!

6/10

Uss Zumwalt? Ive got her in Virtual Sailor

freeciv · « **Reply #891 on:** January 24, 2011, 16:48:51 »

Quote from: RYAN123 on January 24, 2011, 08:15:01

Uss Zumwalt? Ive got her in Virtual Sailor

I think these new warships are ugly. I prefer the old WW2 battleships.

The Ferry King · « **Reply #892 on:** January 24, 2011, 16:58:23 »

Quote from: freeciv on January 24, 2011, 16:48:51

I think these new warships are ugly. I prefer the old WW2 battleships.

sorry i needed to say this,

the reason why they look at that is that their triangular shape makes it hard for radars to spot them as radars always looks for flat objects..
so in wars enemy radars will struggle to spot these type of ships due to their shape

the old battle ships had too many bunks and buildings stacked on top so the radar could immediatly spot that.. But these triangular ones arent

saltydog · « **Reply #893 on:** January 24, 2011, 17:22:28 »

Yes, some strange ways have been thought of to avoid radar detection, including the use of 'water-curtains'..

http://www.williamson-labs.com/ltoc/ship-stealth.htm

freeciv · « **Reply #894 on:** January 24, 2011, 17:37:18 »

Quote from: The Ferry King on January 24, 2011, 16:58:23

sorry i needed to say this,

the reason why they look at that is that their triangular shape makes it hard for radars to spot them as radars always looks for flat objects..
so in wars enemy radars will struggle to spot these type of ships due to their shape

the old battle ships had too many bunks and buildings stacked on top so the radar could immediatly spot that.. But these triangular ones arent

Yes I knew this. But it still looks silly!

And about the "radar invisibility", as you can see in my beautiful diagram, depending on were the radar is it may not work. Radar 1 the signal is deflected, thus making the ship inviable .But with Radar 2 the signal is at just the right angle, so the signal is deflected back to the transmitter so the ship will show up.
However it is true that this design has a smaller radar signature than older "boxer" battleships. With the old design the radar could be at any angle and the signal would almost certainly reflect off of something and return to the transmitter, but with the new design the radar has to be at the "right" angle to reflect.

NOTE: For radar to work the signal must return to the transmitter.

EDIT: forgot to attach the image

Other EDIT: added 2nd paragraph