Hello Guest March 29, 2024, 13:14:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: As stated by Whoever it was  (Read 13059 times)

Fleet Admiral Hayes

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 29
As stated by Whoever it was
« on: September 30, 2008, 01:18:44 »

I have also noticed Titanic's props spinning the wrong way, and it should be a patch in my opinion. Just make the props spin the right way but keep it so it is still technically they were all still spinning the same direction (the dynamics) . :P
Logged
One word mate, pirate. Jack Sparrow

matt5674

  • Guest
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2008, 01:29:05 »

uh i don't want to be rude but there are 2 other topic one is locked of the same but you can post at that one topic bout the same thing.
Logged

llamalord

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2590
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2008, 02:11:13 »

Akson I don't think this needs to be a patch right now.  there are many other much more important things that V-STEP could be working with.
Logged
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"


www.llamalord

RMS Gigantic

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2601
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2008, 03:55:57 »

I have also noticed Titanic's props spinning the wrong way, and it should be a patch in my opinion. Just make the props spin the right way but keep it so it is still technically they were all still spinning the same direction (the dynamics) . :P
You're referring to me! I said that!
Logged

mvsmith

  • Guest
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2008, 14:12:09 »

I have also noticed Titanic's props spinning the wrong way, and it should be a patch in my opinion. Just make the props spin the right way but keep it so it is still technically they were all still spinning the same direction (the dynamics) . :P

What would be the point of correcting a minor visual problem, at great expense, if any necessary changes were not made to the dynamics?
Logged

Nathan|C

  • Guest
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2008, 18:04:02 »

What would be the point of correcting a minor visual problem, at great expense, if any necessary changes were not made to the dynamics?

Agree. VSTEP have more important things to work on. And anyway, in the game the props are in the water 99.9% of the time!
Logged

RMS Gigantic

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2601
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2008, 03:57:54 »

Agree. VSTEP have more important things to work on. And anyway, in the game the props are in the water 99.9% of the time!
But if you hit the Brooklyn Bridge at a decent speed, they become as clear as day! Also, tying her with another large ship tends to cause their exposure. Heck, it becomes obvious just piloting her in high waves or beaching her!

...

You din't think I'm abusing her at all, do you? ;D
Logged

Fleet Admiral Hayes

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 29
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2008, 01:47:12 »

But if you hit the Brooklyn Bridge at a decent speed, they become as clear as day! Also, tying her with another large ship tends to cause their exposure. Heck, it becomes obvious just piloting her in high waves or beaching her!

...

You din't think I'm abusing her at all, do you? ;D

I agree with Gigantic, if you hit the bridge right or a big waves you can clearly see the problem. :P
Logged
One word mate, pirate. Jack Sparrow

llamalord

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2590
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2008, 11:21:40 »

Yes, but why would you want to hit the pilot house. ;D

Just use the boat like it was intended to be used. :-\
Logged
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"


www.llamalord

Agent|Austin

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 4817
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2008, 18:27:33 »

how many, Titanics prop is spinning the wrong way topic do we need!!!!
Logged

RMS Gigantic

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2601
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2008, 23:11:44 »

how many, Titanics prop is spinning the wrong way topic do we need!!!!
Until a (hopefully the next) patch is released and silences us! ;D
Logged

Agent|Austin

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 4817
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2008, 23:17:48 »

Until a (hopefully the next) patch is released and silences us! ;D

Or until I find my tape and rope
Logged

RMS Gigantic

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2601
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2008, 23:19:35 »

Or until I find my tape and rope

I don't know whether you're going to use that to tape my mouth shut or hang yourself! ;D
Logged

Agent|Austin

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 4817
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2008, 06:51:11 »

I don't know whether you're going to use that to tape my mouth shut or hang yourself! ;D
tape your mouth shut THEN hang myself. *remembers his old life of trying to kill himself*
Logged

Nathan|C

  • Guest
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2008, 12:32:18 »

But if you hit the Brooklyn Bridge at a decent speed, they become as clear as day! Also, tying her with another large ship tends to cause their exposure. Heck, it becomes obvious just piloting her in high waves or beaching her!


 ::)

As i said, they are in the water 99.9% of the time. I don't see why people want to crash it into a bridge though, that's just stupid  ::)
Logged

RMS Gigantic

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 2601
Re: As stated by Whoever it was
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2008, 02:41:55 »

::)

As i said, they are in the water 99.9% of the time. I don't see why people want to crash it into a bridge though, that's just stupid  ::)
That disproves the possibility of Titanic passing under the Brooklyn Bridge, as seen in "Raise the Titanic", though!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 
 


SMF 2.0.14 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines