Hello Guest November 22, 2024, 16:58:11 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

Poll

Which one? Pic one or two?

Pic 1: PO Rotterdam
- 1 (33.3%)
Pic 2: Titanic bridge
- 2 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 2


Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which pic should go in sig?  (Read 4997 times)

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Which pic should go in sig?
« on: July 17, 2007, 19:38:39 »

Hi Folks,

I've made to pics for my signature. Which one do you think is the best?

1 Vote. You can change it aswell.

Thanks!
Shipaddict

BTW: First pic is 51 kbs and pic two 57kbs so there not that big.





EDIT: Added pic on main message for those who can't see attachment
« Last Edit: July 19, 2007, 20:41:48 by Shipaddict »
Logged

Paddy134

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 459
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2007, 21:48:49 »

The one with the pride of rotterdam looks best.
Logged

Season

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 806
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2007, 21:55:18 »

Pride of Rotterdam is the best one :)
Logged

Eemspoort

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 372
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2007, 21:56:05 »

I agree, voted for Pride of Rotterdam!
Logged
m/s "Eemspoort"
1961, Hilgers A.G.-Rheinbröhl
76,2 x 8,20 x 2,72 mtr, 1085 ton
Deutz RBV 6 M 545, 800 HP @ 380 rpm
Daf KMD 250.2, 250 HP @ 1800 rpm, bowthruster

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2007, 17:28:46 »

One more ;)



Shipaddict
« Last Edit: July 20, 2007, 12:02:54 by Shipaddict »
Logged

Paddy134

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 459
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2007, 19:08:22 »

No the one with the Pride of Rotterdam is still the best.
Logged

Season

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 806
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2007, 19:09:05 »

Titanic one is the best now.
Logged

Orinoco

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 374
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2007, 10:15:10 »

Titanic one is the best now.

Yep, I agree, if only for the better shape.
Logged

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2007, 14:32:32 »

Can you all remove your vote if you want? After i edited the poll it didn't say remove anymore. Doesit still say that for you?
Logged

Orinoco

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 374
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2007, 14:46:44 »

Nope, can't remove/change my vote.
Logged

groennegaard

  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 1641
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2007, 14:54:56 »

Please make these signature pictures as small as possible as they make the forum slow (the pages will take longer to load) and the pages look a bit messy. Such a picture should not exceed 50 kb.

Regards
groennegaard
Logged

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2007, 15:53:29 »

Please make these signature pictures as small as possible as they make the forum slow (the pages will take longer to load) and the pages look a bit messy. Such a picture should not exceed 50 kb.

Regards
groennegaard

Checked. The most was 57kbs.

I will reset the voting amd start again.
Logged

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2007, 16:57:01 »

Closing voting tomorrow (Friday) at around mid day. ;)

Shipaddict ;)
Logged

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2007, 20:40:38 »

Taking the Arriverser out now. It's between Titanic and the Rot ;D

EDIT: Poll went wrong. Reset count again. Sorry.
Shipaddict ;)
« Last Edit: July 19, 2007, 20:42:35 by Shipaddict »
Logged

Shipaddict

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3747
Re: Which pic should go in sig?
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2007, 12:00:01 »

Voting is now closed!

Titanic wins.

Shipaddict ;)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 
 


SMF 2.0.14 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines