Topic: Rate that Ugly Ship! (Read 424137 times)

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #25 on:** December 23, 2008, 12:44:04 »

Thats not ugly, it looks like something out of james bond! 2/10. This is ugly though, look at that forehead-Yuk:

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #26 on:** December 23, 2008, 13:48:34 »

Yes, I havnt seen such a bad colour design since the Norwich City football kit of the mid 90s, or Arsenals of 1991. But back to ugly ships, you have to look closely with this one:

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #27 on:** December 23, 2008, 14:17:47 »

Yuk! 10/10! I know its normal for those sorts of pushers, but 2bridges is still ugly! This P&O stena ship is ugly though aswell:

Quaysider · « **Reply #28 on:** December 23, 2008, 18:52:26 »

Quote from: Cushioncraft on December 22, 2008, 23:44:38

Now that's really fun!!! 1000/10! Weird proportions between the hull's height, lenght & the size of superstructure.
Is she a some kind of a dry cargo vessel or a specialized vessel?

sorry for late reply - no access at work! Yes she is a dry cargo vessel, built as a hopper. Often carries radioactive cargos into the Humber but I didn't say that

Spruce - when you look at her history you'll see she was just a np pontoon until she was converted into a barge carrier

Gloat · « **Reply #29 on:** December 23, 2008, 19:03:45 »

Thats a nice vessel?

3/10

has this one been given before

Titanic ship of dreams · « **Reply #30 on:** December 23, 2008, 20:59:45 »

Quote from: Nathan|C on December 22, 2008, 19:02:59

8/10, What on earth is with the bow!?

How about this:...

Actually it's called X-Bau and is cuts thru waves "smoother" tham a regular one.....

J3nsen · « **Reply #31 on:** December 24, 2008, 00:56:17 »

lol 10/10....

Pretty colors

MrFlappy102 · « **Reply #32 on:** December 24, 2008, 04:27:19 »

Honestly I think Pride of Rotterdam and the pride of hull are quite ugly. Too many flat sides, no Balconies, kind of reminds me of a prison ship!

Oh by the way, I saw the post on the first page saying that all the NCL ships are ugly, I agree with that with the exception of the Norwegian Sun and the Norwegian Sky. I think they are the only two NCL ships that don't look like floating blocks.

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #33 on:** December 24, 2008, 09:11:21 »

Ill ust give you 8/10.

Quote from: MrFlappy102 on December 24, 2008, 04:27:19

Honestly I think Pride of Rotterdam and the pride of hull are quite ugly. Too many flat sides, no Balconies, kind of reminds me of a prison ship!

Oh by the way, I saw the post on the first page saying that all the NCL ships are ugly, I agree with that with the exception of the Norwegian Sun and the Norwegian Sky. I think they are the only two NCL ships that don't look like floating blocks.

I actually agree there Mr flappy, what i dont get is why they made the bridge that really stupid shape they do, its just pafetic!

New one, might aswell be known as ss box, its the pride of bilbao:

J3nsen · « **Reply #34 on:** December 24, 2008, 10:02:36 »

I think that one is nice... Not soo ugly that peopel want it too...

1/10

Sam · « **Reply #35 on:** December 24, 2008, 12:05:47 »

Hehe, the chair sais enough.

Alabama

saltydog · « **Reply #36 on:** December 24, 2008, 12:07:35 »

It even has an azipod..

MrFlappy102 · « **Reply #37 on:** December 24, 2008, 17:13:02 »

8/10 It's like someone with a tiny head.
Okay, How about Carnival Fantasy. For a "Fun Ship" it looks pretty boring.

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #38 on:** December 24, 2008, 18:03:05 »

He he 8/10 cushioncraft for the floating table. Carnival have 7 other ships which are identical to Carnival Fantasy. all of them Are ugly of course! Here is another ugly cruise ship, MSC Poesia, which has a very ugly forecastle which is stupidly square as well as stupidly steep decks above the bridge:

MrFlappy102 · « **Reply #39 on:** December 24, 2008, 19:10:55 »

5/10, I actually kind of think it looks cool.
What about Carnival Triumph. I don't really know why, I've just never liked the look of it.

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #40 on:** December 24, 2008, 19:39:08 »

The funnel should be squater but on a higher deck, the foward decks are too tall, it just is unbalanced-10/10!

Here is an ugly ferry, herald of free enterprise. this ship however sank, god rest her and all the passengers who went down with her. She was ugly, but she was no less a ship:

Nathan|C · « **Reply #41 on:** December 24, 2008, 19:42:53 »

5/10, without being insensative, that is an ugly ship. Her sister is Pride of Bruges, which i posted on Page 1.

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #42 on:** December 24, 2008, 19:45:44 »

Oh did you? sorry. This is ugly though, the first oriana:

MrFlappy102 · « **Reply #43 on:** December 24, 2008, 20:14:05 »

10/10. Looks like they forgot some steel plates on the stern. And have they ever heard of Paint?

Here's one, it's calle dthe Nippin Maru

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #44 on:** December 24, 2008, 20:15:53 »

If the funnel was further back it would upset the balance even more and make it worse. and Mrflappy, thats one ugly ship! 9/10

MrFlappy102 · « **Reply #45 on:** December 24, 2008, 21:04:30 »

How about this?

RMSGreatBritain · « **Reply #46 on:** December 24, 2008, 21:07:15 »

Thats not ugly. just small. reminds me of ronnie corbitt. Not ugly, just small.

Kapn Jonah · « **Reply #47 on:** December 24, 2008, 21:21:51 »

1/10! i like the design of that vessel!

ShipSinker55 · « **Reply #48 on:** December 24, 2008, 21:38:57 »

Is this cool?

Kapn Jonah · « **Reply #49 on:** December 24, 2008, 21:41:37 »

Woah! 5/10

Author Topic: Rate that Ugly Ship! (Read 424137 times)

Titanic ship of dreams

Nathan|C