Topic: A windup surely... (damaged ship) (Read 2948 times)

Stuart2007 · « **on:** January 29, 2010, 21:24:00 »

Is there any truth in the wikipedia article that says PO Pride of Canterbury operated from January - November 2008 with only one propellor.

I am sure technically it is possible to steer the ship, but is this legal? Or has wikipedia got a dodgy entry...?

John Carter · « **Reply #1 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:31:04 »

without doing any research, i have difficulty with the safety aspect of operating with half the number of props ........... but i never cease to be surprised.

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:34:31 »

I'm reading the MAIB report now... seems like the master dropped a nut... ignored his No1s advice... I imagine the master is now a deckhand and the No1 is skipper...

I think this must be a wikipedia error...

EDIT
http://www.maib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/POC.pdf
Some really impressive photos - page 9.

The Ferry Man · « **Reply #3 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:36:33 »

Nope - It is true

But freight only

And a Slow crossing time too...

John Carter · « **Reply #4 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:47:19 »

i will try steering the por with 1 engine & see what happens

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #5 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:48:07 »

WOW!

I am amazed this is legal.... Remember that time when a PO ship (Aquitaine?) lost a CPP hydraulic pump and effectively the skipper had to steer and stop the ship on one prop only...?

Suppose, just suppose, that the same thing happened to the Canterbury... 2 props - 1 = 1 1 prop - 1 = 0

With 0 props...

Would it be a bad idea, do you think, to mention this in the topic which is fast becoming "are PO in the quagmire"?

Quote from: John Carter on January 29, 2010, 21:47:19

i will try steering the por with 1 engine & see what happens

Yes, John... But if you hit something, you press ctrl+r... not sink.

McGherkin · « **Reply #6 on:** January 29, 2010, 21:50:31 »

well it saves on fuel!

Just you wait, in a year's time P&O will be affixing huge sails to their ships, and using no engines at all!

The Ferry Man · « **Reply #7 on:** January 29, 2010, 22:06:03 »

Quote from: McGherkin on January 29, 2010, 21:50:31

well it saves on fuel!

Just you wait, in a year's time P&O will be affixing huge sails to their ships, and using no engines at all!

Funny you should say that...

I have seen the European Endeavour and European Seaway class as 'Underway by Sail' on AIS before...

Capt. Matt · « **Reply #8 on:** January 29, 2010, 23:41:49 »

I've driven a vessel with only one engine...under the guidance of my father mind you there is obviously a large size difference however I'm sure it works under the same concept, you just need to turn the rudder to port say if the port engine is the only one working

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 29, 2010, 23:51:02 »

Quote from: The Ferry Man on January 29, 2010, 22:06:03

Funny you should say that...

I have seen the European Endeavour and European Seaway class as 'Underway by Sail' on AIS before...

If you have a ferry company that isn't performing very well (and of course I am not even slightly hinting this with PO) then anything to save fuel... Perhaps a discount for passengers who row? (a similar method is suggested for Ryanscare- passengers who flap their arms to help the plane fly get a discount)

Quote from: Capt. Matt on January 29, 2010, 23:41:49

I've driven a vessel with only one engine...under the guidance of my father mind you there is obviously a large size difference however I'm sure it works under the same concept, you just need to turn the rudder to port say if the port engine is the only one working

Like I said, the technicalities of it are not in question, just the wisdom of it... As you say, there is a large size difference...

The Ferry Man · « **Reply #10 on:** January 29, 2010, 23:52:00 »

It also couldn't sail if the weather was a bit windy...

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #11 on:** January 29, 2010, 23:55:11 »

Like it is on the Dover straits between Jan 1 and Dec 31?

In fact, they did lay the ship up from June for that very reason. Personally I think it an affront to safety that they even tried to keep it in service and even more appaling that the MCA allowed it.

Would you drive a car with only 2 wheels?

McGherkin · « **Reply #12 on:** January 30, 2010, 13:34:59 »

I believe a car with two wheels is called a motorbike.

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #13 on:** January 30, 2010, 13:55:51 »

Quote from: McGherkin on January 30, 2010, 13:34:59

I believe a car with two wheels is called a motorbike.

No. a motorbike is called a motorbike. They are very distinctive compared to a two wheeled car. For example, they have no roof, floors, doors, bumpers, the main thing of course is that the wheels are in the middle and nicely balanced, compared to a 2 wheeled car...

McGherkin · « **Reply #14 on:** January 30, 2010, 14:31:54 »

*ahem*

another Plymouthian, a world record holder no less.

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #15 on:** January 30, 2010, 15:37:35 »

Exactly... Now, would you take that car across the Dover straits, loaded with passengers, trucks, crew et all?

I think you'd probably have more chance docking it than a PO ferry with 1 prop... And it would probably be faster.

BTW bearing in mind that the power required for X speed increases as a square, one wonders what their maximum speed is. 5-6 kts?

McGherkin · « **Reply #16 on:** January 30, 2010, 15:40:15 »

Well one of the Royal Navy's ships, can't remember which, has been running on one engine for ages... They just can't afford the fuel...

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #17 on:** January 30, 2010, 15:50:46 »

Royal navy? No money... Surely not.

Admiral bar bills are so expensive...

Given this government (apologies to the world- they'll be gone in a few months) one wonders if they might start using sponsorship on the side of ships...

"HMS Cornwall... Sponsored by the Iranian Tourist board"
"RFA Wave Knight... brought to you by the Somali Coastguard"
"hms Invincible... welcome to Alang"

McGherkin · « **Reply #18 on:** January 30, 2010, 15:54:37 »

HMS Ocean: Watch Eastenders! Now you know why we're fighting you.

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #19 on:** January 30, 2010, 15:59:29 »

Quote from: McGherkin on January 30, 2010, 15:54:37

HMS Ocean: Watch Eastenders! Now you know why we're fighting you.

Don't get it.

McGherkin · « **Reply #20 on:** January 30, 2010, 16:15:38 »

Don't worry, I don't know either.

Stuart2007 · « **Reply #21 on:** January 30, 2010, 16:28:19 »

Oh dear, we have marginally gone off topic.

Is that the heavy handed approach of a particular goderator coming along

Author Topic: A windup surely... (damaged ship) (Read 2948 times)